Chevrolet Colorado 2006 White

We use cookies to make it more convenient for you to use the site More details → body design, spaciousness, ground clearance, build quality, trunk volume quality of materials, cost of service Roomy trunk, large interior, exterior, good chassis. Overall approx. Finishing materials are bad in places, there is no front armrest. For a long time, like most Russian motorists, I preferred sedans. There were old Japanese women, even more ancient Germans like the Passat. But, as you can imagine, this type of body is not quite suitable for people who have a family and small children. And I was among them. What to buy? This question arises first when you think about changing the car. My wife and I went to car dealerships. We looked at the Mazda 5 - large, sliding doors, everything is great, but the price is not very good. Ford S-Max and Galaxy are not bad, but only in good trim levels from 1.5 million. We also looked at crossovers, but they have cramped trunks. I remembered that there is a Chevrolet Orlando. The car has just appeared, no one really knows anything Chevrolet Colorado 2006 White  about it yet. I decided to take a look. Outwardly, I and my wife liked it. Brutal, such a truck. Everything is fine in the cabin, except for the seat upholstery. It is of some kind of dirty color, so when the covers appeared on sale, I immediately bought it. Now the interior is much nicer and the salon is 7-seater. The seats fold (roll up) interesting. In general, I bought it, although the purchase came out at a pretty penny with those options that I ordered separately. But it is still cheaper than the cars that I saw. Now the odometer is only 12 thousand km, I drove it - count nothing at all. But the car turned out to be pleasant, it is well controlled, although it rolls in turns. The engine runs smoothly, the gearbox shifts clearly. Everything that was originally planned to carry fits into the trunk. There is even a place left. By the way, taxi drivers buy a car well, and this is the first sign the fact that it is roomy. For a year, nothing broke and I am sure it will not break further. Now I'm saving up money to put on good music and an amp. Comfort. Versatility. Adaptation to conditions. Classic design. Hello dear. I own this device for a year now, so I will allow myself to write the first review on this rare animal for the author. I will break the report into small blocks so that everyone reads what is interesting to him. Brief technical description. Engine. In my configuration there is a 5-cylinder in-line engine with a volume of 3.5 liters, 220 hp, 300 Nm at 2800 rpm. The motor is obtained by sawing off one cylinder from an inline-six Vortek, which was installed on the TrailBlazer. The sound is certainly not so hot, it loses to the V-shaped six of Blazer and even more so to Takham, but for the sake of economy I put up with it. By the way, when I tested the Hammer-H3 last year (the H3 itself is built on the same GMT-355 platform, glory to the marketers :)) with an upgraded 3.7 engine, it seemed to me more sluggish (maybe it's Hammer's Euro-4). Transmission. The box is an indestructible 4L60E machine, as on the Blazer, it seems like a block for adapting to the driving style (not in all trim levels) is fitted, a razdatka with a lowering is its own (and there were many options), manual (push-button) connection of 4Hi and 4Lo modes. Chassis. Her Majesty RAMA :), plug-in front axle, self-block in the rear axle (not in all trim levels). Front suspension torsion bar, rear leaf spring. Front disc brakes, rear drums, ABS is present. Salon. The front sofa is divided in a ratio of 3: 2 (the shift poker on the steering wheel allows), officially a 6-seater car. The back seat is spacious enough (2 child seats, one adult accommodates at least me, it provokes just a calm driving style, you know that when necessary he will go as fast as required. Profitability. Directly related to the previous paragraph. If you tear everyone up at traffic lights, then you can probably burn 25 liters per 100 km. I will not name my driving style as a pensioner, the consumption figures are as follows: in the summer on the highway 11-12 liters, in the city 13-14 liters, in winter traffic jams maximum 18 l / 100 km (gasoline A-92, I count the consumption by checks, so underfilling is included :)), the average consumption for the year turned out to be 14.22 l / 100 km. For those in doubt, I recommend returning to the engine point - the moment is reached at 2800 rpm, during normal driving, the box swit https://cars45.com.gh/cQoNLe4rLXz85xN0Vki1jubz